Punctuated Loci on Chromosome IV Determine Natural Variation in Orsay Virus Susceptibility of Caenorhabditis elegans Strains Bristol N2 and Hawaiian CB4856.

Host-pathogen interactions play a major role in evolutionary selection and shape natural genetic variation. The genetically distinct Caenorhabditis elegans strains, Bristol N2 and Hawaiian CB4856, are differentially susceptible to the Orsay virus (OrV). Here, we report the dissection of the genetic architecture of susceptibility to OrV infection. We compare OrV infection in the relatively resistant wild-type CB4856 strain to the more susceptible canonical N2 strain. To gain insight into the genetic architecture of viral susceptibility, 52 fully sequenced recombinant inbred lines (CB4856 × N2 RILs) were exposed to OrV. This led to the identification of two loci on chromosome IV associated with OrV resistance. To verify the two loci and gain additional insight into the genetic architecture controlling virus infection, introgression lines (ILs) that together cover chromosome IV, were exposed to OrV. Of the 27 ILs used, 17 had an CB4856 introgression in an N2 background, and 10 had an N2 introgression in a CB4856 background. Infection of the ILs confirmed and fine-mapped the locus underlying variation in OrV susceptibility, and we found that a single nucleotide polymorphism in cul-6 may contribute to the difference in OrV susceptibility between N2 and CB4856. An allele swap experiment showed the strain CB4856 became as susceptible as the N2 strain by having an N2 cul-6 allele, although having the CB4856 cul-6 allele did not increase resistance in N2. In addition, we found that multiple strains with nonoverlapping introgressions showed a distinct infection phenotype from the parental strain, indicating that there are punctuated locations on chromosome IV determining OrV susceptibility. Thus, our findings reveal the genetic complexity of OrV susceptibility in C. elegans and suggest that viral susceptibility is governed by multiple genes.IMPORTANCE Genetic variation determines the viral susceptibility of hosts. Yet, pinpointing which genetic variants determine viral susceptibility remains challenging. Here, we have exploited the genetic tractability of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans to dissect the genetic architecture of Orsay virus infection. Our results provide novel insight into natural determinants of Orsay virus infection.

Revealing factors determining immunodominant responses against dominant epitopes.

Upon recognition of peptide-MHC complexes by T cell receptors (TCR), the cognate T cells expand and differentiate into effector T cells to generate protective immunity. Despite the fact that any immune response generates a diverse set of TCR clones against a particular epitope, only a few clones are highly expanded in any immune response. Previous studies observed that the highest frequency clones usually control viral infections better than subdominant clones, but the reasons for this dominance among T cell clones are still unclear. Here, we used publicly available TCR amino acid sequences to study which factors determine whether a response becomes immunodominance (ID) per donor; we classified the largest T cell clone as the epitope-specific dominant clone and all the other clones as subdominant responses (SD). We observed a distinctively hydrophobic CDR3 in ID responses against a dominant epitope from influenza A virus, compared to the SD responses. The common V-J combinations were shared between ID and SD responses, suggesting that the biased V-J recombination events are restricted by epitope specificity; thus, the immunodominance is not directly determined by a bias combination of V and J genetic segments. Our findings reveal a close similarity of global sequence properties between dominant and subdominant clones of epitope-specific responses but detectable distinctive amino acid enrichments in ID. Taken together, we believe this first comparative study of immunodominant and subdominant TCR sequences can guide further studies to resolve factors determining the immunodominance of antiviral as well as tumor-specific T cell responses.